Aerial Infrared (IR) Thermography has its roots in military
applications. Almost all aerial IR is performed by the
military, but there are many commercial uses. These non-military
applications are the focus of this paper. In order to produce
an easy to understand, high quality and useable report,
the data must be acquired, recorded and processed in an
efficient and effective way. The farther away one can get
from the subject of an infrared survey, while maintaining
the needed spatial resolution and thermal sensitivity,
the more usable the data. This is the aerial advantage.
Equipment & Crew
Both helicopters and light airplanes can be used to perform
aerial infrared surveys. A helicopter is best used if the
number of targets or distance between targets is low because
there are inherent problems with vibrations, slower ferry
speeds and higher operating costs. These problems can be
offset by being able to use relatively inexpensive small
format (~65,000 pixels) focal plane array imagers.
If a
light airplane is used, the imager must have a higher spatial
resolution (~262,000 pixels or more), because it must operate
at higher altitudes and therefore farther away from the
target, allowing the same resolution from four times the
distance. The advantage of using a large format imager
is that the field of view (FOV) is larger, making report
preparation much easier and the report product superior.
Larger lenses can improve the needed ground resolution
element (GRE), or the size of one pixel on the ground,
if some signal strength degradation is acceptable, but
the FOV suffers as a result.
One might mosaic or ‘paste’ many
images together but this is very labor-intensive and often
cannot be accomplished without greatly distorting the imagery.
It is always better to have more pixels. It is nearly impossible
to get professional results with hand-held imagers. The
imager should be fixed-mounted solid (see Figure 1), turret-mounted
or fixed-manually articulated. In any case, a well maintained
aircraft, experienced aircrew and an imager capable of
the resolution required for the intended task should be
used.
|
Figure 1) Large format infrared
imager, fixed-mounted
|
The type of infrared imager used will dictate how images
are recorded and saved. Modern infrared cameras have a
variety of storage media, but must be within reach and/or
have remote controls so that the camera can be moved, lenses
adjusted and the images stored. Since the pilot and thermographer
are extremely busy during the flight, one or both may not
see every possible anomaly, so no matter what type of imager
or storage medium, a videotaped record of all the ‘raw’ infrared
imaging should always be made.
Precise navigation is important in any aircraft, and particularly
so in nighttime aerial infrared operations. A global positioning
system (GPS) is a necessity. Combining the GPS with a mobile
mapping program on a computer and a video encoder-decoder
(VED) is very useful, especially when multiple targets
need to be imaged. The VED encodes the videotape with a
continuous stream of GPS derived data (latitude/ longitude,
altitude, date, time and speed, etc.) and displays the
information through the video signal (see Figure 2). All
equipment in the aircraft must be secured with wires labeled,
shielded from electromagnetic interference and out of the
way.
|
Figure 2) Video encoder-decoder (VED) annotation
guide
|
Most aerial infrared imaging is performed at night because
reflected and direct daylight solar radiation usually adversely
affects the imagery. Nighttime infrared imaging is NOT
a job for amateur pilots or airsick-prone infrared equipment
operators. The professional pilot should be specifically
trained and experienced in aerial IR operations. He/she
will be flying low, slow and maneuvering without much room
for recovery...in the dark.
Upon returning from the mission, the report must be prepared.
The office equipment needed to analyze imagery and produce
reports is the same as that used by ground-based infrared
thermographers. This includes a computer workstation complete
with digital photographic and thermographic imaging peripherals
for handling infrared images, daylight photographs and
capable of producing high quality reports in a popular
format. Also needed are specialized video capture, image
processing, computer aided design & drafting (CADD)
software and mapping software necessary for producing drawings
and specialized parts of the final report product. A high
quality printer is required for printing the report with
photographic quality.
Applications
Listed below are various aerial infrared applications
and descriptions.
Waterways and Drainage Systems
The flow of a liquid into the body of another liquid can
be identified using infrared thermography - if there is
a temperature difference between the two liquids. Typically,
liquids flowing into a body of water appear warm as compared
to the surface water in a creek, stream, river or lake – particularly
during cooler times of the year, due to the relative warmth
of the ground a short distance below the surface. Leaks
from nearby water, sewer and/or stormwater lines and direct
run-off from a sloped surface can be detected because the
warm plume flowing over the ground toward the water and
the liquid joining and flowing downstream with the body
of water are visible in the thermal infrared spectrum.
In most parts of the US, late fall, winter and early
spring are well suited to this type of inspection because
the
difference between water temps (ground and surface waters)
is present and because interference to view due to overhanging
foliage is minimized. The waterway is flown and infrared
images are saved with exact location information of each
thermal anomaly (see Figure 3). A map is created with
exact latitude/longitude of each marked area. The system
operator
then takes a hand-held GPS device to each location and
tests the outfall for signs of contamination. If necessary,
the outfall is traced back to its source.
|
Figure 3) Stormwater drainage system outfall flowing
into a creek
|
Aerial IR can also be used to detect illegal dumping and/or
discharges, track pollution such as waste spills or oil
spills, monitor sewage treatment plant discharges, manage
heated water from power plant cooling towers, monitor ground
water seepage into rivers, streams and lakes and measure
the amount of fresh water from ground sources that are
introduced into an estuary.
Animal Census
Many warm-blooded animals can be found and counted from
the air. Aerial IR is far more accurate than any other
method and primarily used by government agencies. Animals
such as deer (see Figure 4), moose and large migratory
birds are among the most popular counted. Population density
information is used to monitor and control the population
of these animals on city, county, state and federal lands.
|
|
Figure 4) Deer in a forested area - three in one
group
(left and slightly
below image center) and two in another group (right bottom edge).
|
Geothermal
When a road or building complex is planned, the site can
be flown over with aerial IR to determine if any geothermal
activity is present at the surface. This allows the planner
to route the road around the activity or decide the site
is unsuitable for the intended purpose.
Pipes and Pipelines
Pipes and pipelines are usually difficult to survey. Trees,
shrubs, brush, water and man-made structures like bridges,
roads, sidewalks and buildings often cover pipes. If a
liquid is leaking from a pipe and the location of the leak
is unknown, an aerial IR survey can be used to find the
leak. Even if the pipe itself cannot be seen on the surface,
it may be possible to see the leaking liquid and narrow
the search to a relatively small area. The best results
are found when the pipe is not buried deeply, has a high
flow and when the difference in temperature between the
liquid and the ground above is high.
We have flown over known leaks on natural gas pipelines
and not been able to measure any temperature difference
on the pipe or the surrounding surfaces. Usually, color
IR (CIR) and not thermal IR is more effective. CIR is used
to look at the damage to vegetation around the natural
gas pipeline leak.
Forest Fires
The U.S. Forest Service uses aerial infrared imaging to
monitor forest fires. Very accurate mosaic infrared maps
of active fires can be made to help with fire management
and suppression efforts. This information can be sent immediately
to those in charge of controlling fire lines. Thermal intensity
is resolved to classify the hottest sections of the active
fire, therefore pinpointing the areas of most intense thermal
energy. These digital aerial maps are loaded to hand-held
GPS devices to enable ground teams to navigate directly
to the hot spots rapidly, either by walking, driving or
flying in a helicopter. Thermal IR provides an important
visual reference locator by identifying the hot spots with
respect to terrain features in the thermal imagery. Positive
identification of hot spots is rapid even through dense
smoke.
Structural Fires
Aerial infrared can be helpful to the firefighters of
structural fires especially on large, single story buildings.
Often the smoke escapes the building from a different location
than the hottest part of the fire. These areas can be imaged
and the firefighters informed as to the location of the
hottest areas.
Landfill Fires
Subsurface fires can also be monitored using aerial infrared
thermography. Landfill fires (see Figure 5) can be hazardous
to the surrounding environment. Knowing where, how many
and the extent of underground fires is useful to those
in charge of containing and/or extinguishing them. Similarly,
peat, coal and wood chip piles, which combust spontaneously,
can be monitored.
|
Figure 5) Infrared image of a landfill fire. The
hot spot is in center of image
|
Indian Trails
Where ancient Indian trails cross the desert, the land
under the trails has been compacted. By using nighttime
aerial infrared imaging, the thermographer can see this
higher density differentiated from the lower density adjacent
to the trails.
Search and Rescue (SAR)
SAR operations are often ‘rush’ jobs where
conditions are less than ideal. Aerial infrared SAR is
better than ground-based SAR in most instances, however
it is still very overrated. People targets either do not
want to be seen, are disabled and unable to move to an
area where they can be seen, or are trying to keep the
warmth of their body close by insulating themselves, so
they cannot be seen.
Steam and High Temperature Hot Water (HTHW) Systems Commonly referred to as district heating systems, steam
(see Figure 6) and HTHW systems can be imaged to find leaks
and other thermal anomalies. Even from high altitudes,
steam line inspections are one of the easiest applications
for the aerial infrared thermographer. Thermal contrast
between active underground steam lines (especially leaks)
and the surrounding ground are usually good. HTHW loops,
while not as brilliant as steam systems, can be flown in
the same manner. Sometimes leaks appear as cool spots because
the water has come to the surface and is being cooled by
evaporation. In both cases, the systems can be flown and
problem areas pinpointed and documented. Along with other
data sets, geographical information system (GIS) maps can
be produced for the system operator.
|
Figure 6) Infrared image of a university steam system.
A leak is evident slightly above the center of the
image
|
High Voltage Electric Utility Transmission and Distribution
Lines
Detecting electrical faults on high voltage electrical
transmission lines is fairly easy and can be accomplished
rapidly from a light aircraft. However, even from short
distances, accurate temperatures of electrical faults are
impossible to measure (quantify). There are several problems
associated with temperature measurement from the air. These
include spot size to target distance ratios, reflection
of the objects surveyed, and having a sufficient load on
the line at the time of the survey, among others. The spot
size to target distance ratio is the number one problem
with respect to temperature measurement. Specification
writers have not yet realized the seriousness of this problem
and continue to ask for quantitative data on fault areas.
The fact is that infrared cameras in general commercial
use today cannot measure accurate temperatures on small
objects from distances of 50 feet...much less from reliably
safe flying distances. A one-inch (relative size of a transmission
line splice) target cannot be measured from that distance,
plain and simple, although it can be detected. These spot
sizes are unmanageable and inaccurate on any target that
does not have a large homogeneous heat signature. The GRE
is critical to the measure of spatial resolution in aerial
infrared thermography. Nyquist's frequency theorem states
that an object less than two times the size of a sensor's
GRE cannot be resolved for measurement, so a 3x3 pixel
or GRE spot is needed for reliably obtaining measurements.
This shortcoming may be addressed by using a more powerful
lens to reduce the GRE for a given distance, but then the
sensor's FOV is reduced, limiting the area covered over
a given period of time. So, if one is using a small format
IR camera (256 x 256 pixels) in a helicopter only 50 feet
away from a 1 inch hot spot, it is impossible to obtain
accurate temperatures using a standard lens. The smallest
hot spot that could be accurately measured with one of
these imagers is over 2", even at that extremely short
distance. Also, from the air, using a more powerful lens
does not work well because vibration is more evident in
the form of image 'shaking'. Image 'smearing' may also
occur due to an increase in the apparent speed of the sensor's
view across the ground. In the air, there are few substitutes
for a large pixel array, but even using large format detectors,
one cannot and should not profess to measure temperatures
on very small objects. These anomalies can be seen, and
by comparing them to similarly loaded phases or equipment,
potential problem areas can be identified, saved and marked
on a map. For ‘good’ measurements, a ground
verification team should be used to inspect suspect hot
spots from the ground (cloudy nights are best) and verify
the findings of the aerial IR survey. They will be closer
to the target and with a powerful lens on a stable surface,
much more accurate.
Because they are smaller, lower to the ground and often
run through populated areas, high voltage electrical distribution
lines are much more difficult to see against all the thermal
clutter on the ground such as trees, street lights, people,
animals, etc., than transmission lines. Therefore, they
are best left to ground-based infrared thermographers.
Roof Moisture Surveys No other application better illustrates the advantage
of aerial infrared thermography over ground-based infrared,
than infrared roof moisture surveys. Regularly scheduled
infrared surveys quantify areas of moisture (water) contamination
in insulated flat or low-sloped building roofs (see Figure
7). This helps the building owner assess the roof’s
general condition at all stages of its service life and
make repair decisions based on actual data instead of biased
opinions. Straight down aerial imagery is much more useful
to the owner than on-roof imagery because aerial infrared
images are plan view and because large areas can be seen
in one image, allowing the slightest temperature differences
to be noted.
Aerial is the best platform for performing infrared roof
moisture surveys for these reasons:
|
Figure 7) Illustration of how roof moisture
is detected
using infrared thermography |
Perhaps the biggest advantage of aerial infrared is not
its use on roofs that have well-defined areas of moisture
at all, but on those roofs that are the most difficult
to image from any distance or angle. I am referring to
the roofs that, for instance, have a lot of ballast, are
covered with reflective coatings, have multiple layers
or that for whatever reason are impossible to image while
standing on the roof. With high-resolution aerial imagery,
slight nuances of temperature differences can be seen from
far enough away to actually trace the patterns of heat.
There are two advantages to on-roof infrared. First, it
can be cost-prohibitive to fly a small roof far away from
the aerial infrared thermographer’s operational area.
Second, since on-roof verification does have to take place
at some point by a qualified professional, if a roof consultant
is on the roof with the thermographer and helper on the
night of the survey, areas that exhibit suspect heat patterns
can be tested right then, so that only verified wet areas
are marked.
In the United States, for many different reasons, roofers
and roof consultants – not infrared thermographers,
perform most of the on-roof infrared surveys.
|
Figure 8) Visual photograph of a roof
|
|
Figure 9) Infrared thermograph of a roof
|
|
Figure 10) CADD drawing of a roof
|
Conclusion
As outlined above, there are many commercial uses for
aerial infrared thermography. The aircraft, imager and
crew must be capable of performing the tasks and providing
professional results. With improvements in camera quality
(IR and visual), methodology, platform and software, aerial
infrared thermography has a bright future.
About the Author
Gregory R. Stockton is President of Stockton Infrared
Thermographic Services, Inc. The company’s AITscan
(Aerial Infrared Thermographers) division operates nine
fixed-wing aircraft and one rotor-wing aircraft, performing
many different aerial infrared services in the US, Canada,
Central and South America. Greg has twenty-four years experience
in the construction industry, specializing in facilities
construction, maintenance and energy-related technologies.
He has been performing infrared surveys since 1989.