Ultrasonic
Tips On Monitoring Bearings
For Proper Lubrication
and Wear
Mark
A. Goodman, VP Engineering
UE Systems, Inc.
Background
and Introduction
Current economic
conditions have produced a compelling need to find areas
of cost reduction, which has led to the “downsizing” of
many departments. This has left many managers trying
to do more with less. In order to maintain an efficiently
running operation and improve on worker productivity,
there has been a trend to revise and upgrade Predictive
Maintenance programs. Along with this trend has come
a need for effective technologies and instruments that
enable personnel to become more productive in terms of
equipment inspection and problem solving. Opportunities
in predictive maintenance have led to improvements in
production, reduced maintenance costs, reduced energy
consumption, improved efficient use of personnel, and
increased profitability.
One
of the main reasons for the advances in the area of predictive
maintenance has been the development and use of technologies
such as oil analysis, vibration, infrared and ultrasound. This
paper will examine one of these technologies, airborne/structure-borne
ultrasound. This technology can be considered an integrated
technology since it can be used with infrared, vibration,
and oil analysis inspections as well as independently
in order to perform a multiplicity of inspection activities. Instruments
based on this technology can monitor a wide range of
plant operations and yet are simple enough to be used
with minimal training for basic, effective inspection
routines.
Lightweight
and portable, ultrasound instruments may be used to inspect
a wide variety of equipment. Some typical
applications include:
Leak detection in pressure and vacuum
systems such as, boilers, heat exchangers, condensers,
chillers, fuel cells, tanks, pipes, hatches, hydraulic
systems, compressed air audits, and specialty gas systems,
bearing inspection, testing gears/gearboxes, pumps, motors,
steam trap inspection, valve testing, detection of cavitation,
testing for arcing, tracking, corona in electrical apparatus,
compressor valve analysis
What makes
airborne ultrasound so effective? All operating equipment and most leakage
problems produce a broad range of sound. The high frequency
ultrasonic components of these sounds are extremely short
wave in nature. A short wave signal tends to be fairly
directional. It is therefore easy to isolate these signals
from background plant and operating equipment noises
and to detect their exact location. In addition, as
subtle changes begin to occur in mechanical equipment,
the subtle, directional nature of ultrasound allows these
potential warning signals to be detected early, before
actual failure.
Airborne ultrasound
instruments, often referred to as “ultrasonic translators”, provide
information two ways: qualitative, through the ability
to "hear" ultrasounds through a noise isolating
headphone, and quantitative, via incremental readings
on a meter or display panel.
Although the
ability to gauge intensity and view sonic patterns is important,
it is equally important
to be able to “hear” the ultrasounds produced by various
equipment. That is precisely what makes these instruments
so popular. They allow inspectors to confirm a diagnosis
on the spot by being able to clearly discriminate among
various equipment sounds. This is accomplished in most
ultrasonic translators by an electronic process called “heterodyning” that
accurately converts the ultrasounds sensed by the instrument
into the audible range where users can hear and recognize
them through headphones.
The high frequency, short wave characteristic
of ultrasound enables users to accurately pinpoint the
location of a leak or of a particular mechanical sound.
Most of the
sounds sensed by humans range between 20 Hertz and 20 kilohertz
(20 cycles per
second to 20,000 cycles per second). The average human
threshold is actually 16.5 kHz. These frequencies tend
to be relatively gross when compared with the sound waves
sensed by ultrasonic translators. Low frequency sounds
in the audible range are approximately 1.9 cm (3/4")
up to 17 m (56') in length. The high frequency sounds
sensed by ultrasonic translators are only 0.3 cm (1/8")
up to 1.6 cm (5/8") long. Ultrasound wavelengths
are therefore magnitudes smaller than those of low frequency,
which makes the "ultrasonic environment” much more
conducive to locating and isolating the source of problems
in loud plant environments.
The basic advantages of ultrasound and ultrasonic instruments
are:
They
are directional and can be easily located
They
provide early warning of impending mechanical failure
Instruments
can be used in loud, noisy environments
They
support and enhance other PDM technologies
or can stand on their own in a maintenance program
Instrumentation
Airborne
Ultrasound translators are relatively simple to use. They
consist of a basic hand held unit with headphones, a
meter/display panel, a sensitivity/volume adjustment,
and (most often) interchangeable modules that are used
in either a scanning mode or a contact mode. Some instruments
have the ability to adjust the frequency response from
between 20 to 100 kHz. These instruments may be analog
or digital. An ultrasonic transmitter called a tone
generator is often included for specialized testing.
Many of these
features are useful in helping a user adapt to a specific
test situation. As
an example, should an ultrasound source be too difficult
to locate due to an intense signal, a downward adjustment
of the sensitivity will help a user focus in on the exact
site. Frequency tuning can prove useful in detecting
subtle sounds. As an example, should a low-level leak
occur in a water valve, the frequency tuning can be
adjusted to help a user hear the trickle of the water
as it leaks
through.
Interchangeable
modules allow users to adjust for different types of inspection
problems. The
scanning mode is used to detect ultrasounds that travel
in the atmosphere such as a pressure leak or a corona
discharge, while the contact mode is used to detect
ultrasounds generated within a casing such as in a
bearing, pump,
valve or steam trap housing.
Ultrasound
Bearing Inspection
Ultrasonic
inspection and monitoring of bearings is by far the
most reliable method for detecting incipient bearing failure. The
ultrasonic warning appears prior to a rise in temperature
or an increase in low frequency vibration levels. Ultrasonic
inspection of bearings is useful in recognizing:
The beginning of fatigue failure.
Brinelling of bearing surfaces.
Flooding of or lack of lubricant.
Beginning
of Fatigue Failure
In ball
bearings, as the metal in the raceway, roller or ball
bearing begins to fatigue, a subtle deformation begins
to occur. This deforming of the metal will produce
irregular surfaces, which will cause an increase in
the emission
of ultrasonic sound waves.
A change
in amplitude from the original reading is an indication
of incipient bearing failure. When an ultrasonic reading
exceeds any previous reading by 12 dB, it can be assumed
that the bearing has entered the beginning of the failure
mode.
This
information was originally discovered through experimentation
performed by NASA on ball bearings. In tests
performed while monitoring bearings at frequencies
ranging from 24 through 50 kHz, they found that the
changes in
amplitude indicate incipient (the onset of bearing
failure before any other indicators including heat
and vibration
changes. An ultrasonic system based on detection and
analysis of modulations of bearing resonance frequencies
can provide subtle detection capability, whereas conventional
methods are incapable of detecting very slight faults. As
a ball passes over a pit or fault in the race surface,
it produces an impact. A structural resonance of one
of the bearing components vibrates or “rings” by this
repetitive impact. The sound produced is observed as
an increase in amplitude in the monitored ultrasonic
frequencies of the bearing.
Brinelling of Bearing Surfaces
Brinelling
of bearing surfaces will produce a similar increase
in amplitude due to the flattening process as the balls
get out of round. These flat spots also produce a
repetitive ringing that is detected as an increase
in amplitude
of monitored frequencies.
The
ultrasonic frequencies detected by the Ultraprobe are
reproduced as audible sounds. This “heterodyned” signal
can greatly assist a user in determining bearing problems.
When listening, it is recommended that a user become
familiar with the sounds of a good bearing. A good bearing
is heard as a rushing or hissing noise. Crackling or
rough sounds indicate a bearing in the failure stage. In
certain cases a damaged ball can be heard as a clicking
sound whereas a high intensity, uniform rough sound may
indicate a damaged race or uniform ball damage. Loud
rushing sounds similar to the rushing sound of a good
bearing only slightly rougher, can indicate lack of lubrication. Short
duration increases in the sound level with “rough” or “scratchy” components
indicate a rolling element hitting a “flat” spot and
sliding on the bearing surfaces rather than rotating. If
this condition is detected, more frequent examinations
should be scheduled. In some instances a loud sound
similar to an electric “hum”, referred to as a change
in “tonal quality” will indicate a bearing failure
that can be confirmed with the use of a vibration analyzer
to show the fault frequency.
Lubrication
It is important to consider two elements
of potential failure. One is lack of lubrication while
the other is over-lubrication.
Normal bearing loads cause an elastic
deformation of the elements in the contact area providing
a smooth
elliptical distribution. But bearing surfaces are not
perfectly smooth. For this reason the actual stress
distribution in the contact area will be affected by
a random surface roughness. In the presence of a lubricant
film on a bearing surface, there is a dampening effect
on the stress distribution and the acoustic energy produced
will be low. Should lubrication be reduced to a point
where the stress distribution is no longer present, the
normal rough spots will make contact with the face surfaces
and increase the acoustic energy. These normal microscopic
deformities will begin to produce wear and the possibilities
of small fissures may develop which contributes to the “Pre-Failure” condition. Therefore,
aside from normal wear, the fatigue or service life
of a bearing is strongly influenced by the relative
film
thickness provided by an appropriate lubricant.
Over Lubrication
The right amount of lubrication is very
important. If
a bearing is over-lubricated, the bearing can be pushed
excessively by the lubricant causing additional wear
of the bearing. On the other hand, if there is not enough
lubricant, the bearing will rub on the solid surface…again
causing friction and wear on the bearings. Either case
is detrimental to the life of the bearing. In using
airborne / structure-borne ultrasound, you can take the
guess out of lubrication.
To avoid lack of lubrication note the following:
As
the lubricant film reduces, the sound level will increase. A
rise of about 8 dB over baseline
accompanied by a uniform rushing sound will indicate
lack of lubrication.
When lubricating,
add just enough to return the reading to baseline.
Use
Caution! Some
lubricants will need time to run to uniformly cover the
bearings surface. Lubricate
a little at a time.
An
alternative method is to add lubricant until the sound
level drops off and then
stop lubricating as soon as the sound level jumps back
up.
If
readings do not go back to original levels and remain
high, consider bearing is on the way to the failure mode
and recheck frequently.
Over-Lubrication
When too much lubricant is put into
the bearing housing the pressure builds up and can lead
to an increase of heat
which can create stress and deformity of the bearing or
it can break or “pop” the bearing seal, allowing
lubricant to spill out into unwanted areas such as a motor
winding, or allow contaminants to enter the raceway, all
of which can lead to bearing failure.
To prevent this from occurring:
1. Set a baseline dB level.
2. On subsequent inspections do not lubricate if the dB
levels are equal to or less than 8 decibels over the established
baseline level and the sound quality has not changed.
3. If a reading is 8-10 dB over the established baseline
level, add lubrication until the sound level drops and
suddenly rises. Stop immediately at this point.
Detecting Bearing Failure
There are two basic procedures of testing for bearing
problems:
COMPARATIVE AND HISTORICAL. The
comparative method involves testing two or more similar
bearings and “comparing” potential
differences. Historical testing requires monitoring a specific
bearing over a period of time to establish its history.
By analyzing bearing history, wear patterns at particular
ultrasonic frequencies become obvious, which allows for
early detection and correction of bearing problems.
Some general guidelines:
1. Minimize variables. Try to be as consistent from test
to test as possible.
2. Select one test point and identify it for future
tests.
3. Select same type bearings under similar load conditions
and same rotational speed.
4. Test at the same angle.
5. If the inspection instrument has frequency tuning,
note and use the same frequency.
6. Compare differences of meter reading/dB and sound
quality.
7. Establish a baseline by comparing similar bearings,
using the lowest dB level for the baseline.
8. Save the baseline reading for future reference.
9. Compare this reading with previous (or future readings).
On all future readings, adjust frequency to the original
level.
If the decibel level has moved up
8-10 dB over the baseline accompanied by a uniform “rushing” noise,
this is an indication of lack of lubrication. A 12 dB
rise over
the base- line accompanied by crackling or popping noises
will indicate the bearing has entered the incipient failure
mode.
Slow Speed Bearings
Monitoring slow speed bearings is
possible with ultrasound technology. Most of the ultrasound
instruments will have
a wide sensitivity range and some will have frequency
tuning. With these features it is quite possible to listen
to the
acoustic quality of bearings. In extremely slow bearings
(less 25 RPM), it is often necessary to disregard the
meter display and listen to the sound of the bearing.
In these
extreme situations, the bearings are usually large (1/2" and
up) and greased with high viscosity lubricant. Most often
no sound will be heard as the grease will absorb most
of the acoustic energy. If a sound is heard, usually
a crackling
sound, there is some indication of deformity occurring.
On most other slow speed bearings, it
is possible to set a baseline and monitor as described
above.
Connecting to an FFT Analyzer
Ultrasonic instruments with heterodyning may be connected
to FFT analyzers to enhance the inspection process. A miniphone
plug is inserted into the headphone jack of the instrument
and a BNC connector is attached to the analog in connector
of the FFT. This connection will enable an FFT to receive
the heterodyned (translated), low frequency sound information
detected from the ultrasonic instrument. In this instance
it can be used to monitor and trend bearings, including
low speed bearings. It can also extend the use of the FFT
to record all types mechanical information such as leaking
valves, cavitation, gear wear, etc.
Conclusion
Ultrasound instruments are quite versatile
and are ideally suited to predictive/preventive maintenance
programs. Their
enhanced sensitivity makes them ideally suited to note
early stages of bearing failure and especially lubrication
conditions. By electronically translating ultrasound emissions
down into the audible range, these instruments enable users
to hear and recognize when and when not to add lubrication
thus preventing over lubrication. The “heterodyning” process
is used to connect these instruments to FFT analyzers to
enhance condition assessment and predictive analysis capabilities.