|
Thermographic Inspection of Building
and Roof
Water Intrusion in the State of Florida |
|
|

James Brady |
|
|
Abstract
Public awareness of mold and
moisture-related sickness has grown over the past few years.
This awareness has demanded that water intrusion problems
in buildings be solved. Infrared technology has been shown
to be a viable tool for meeting some of these demands, as
evidenced by some cameras being designed and manufactured
specifically for the task. By far, the leading causes of
water intrusion problems are inferior design and construction,
and the natural degradation of water-sealing building materials
over time.
As a thermographer performing infrared
surveys on buildings and roofs throughout the Southeast
US over the past several years, I have been provided some
great opportunities to observe a wide variety of water intrusion
problems. This paper contains several case studies of infrared
inspections performed on buildings that have experienced
water damage caused by hurricanes, summer climates of extreme
heat, high humidity and heavy rains, and other age-related
ailments. Infrared images showing delaminating stucco, wall
cracks, deteriorated sealants, roof damage, and other related
problems are presented.
Introduction
Florida’s weather conditions
are taxing on buildings. For more than six months during the
year, heavy rains with hot humid temperatures are the norm.
On top of that, the state commonly experiences tropical storms
and hurricanes; storms that reveal a building’s true
vulnerability to water intrusion. Solving these problems is
becoming a main priority for engineers, maintenance personnel,
and others responsible for building care. Fortunately, the
building technology sector is fast realizing the potential
of infrared technology to provide condition assessment of
their facilities and help determine the resources necessary
for remediation.
As a
thermographer performing infrared surveys on buildings and
roofs throughout the State of Florida over the past several
years, I have been provided some unique opportunities to observe
a wide variety of water intrusion problems. This paper contains
several case studies of infrared inspections performed on
buildings that have experienced water damage caused by hurricanes,
summer climates of extreme heat, high humidity and heavy rains,
and other age-related ailments. Infrared images showing delaminating
stucco, wall cracks, deteriorated sealants, roof damage caused
by wall problems, and other related problems are presented.
But before we look at these studies,
I would like to share a few tips and observations I have made
along the way that have made my inspection time in the field
more productive and have helped me to produce accurate and
professional reports.
Useful
Stuff I Have Learned
Field Maps
One of the most useful things to come along
in recent years is Google Earth (GE). Before a project starts,
I log on to GE, locate the property I am inspecting and make
copies of the building’s aerial image to serve as field
maps. If the inspection is going to take me inside the building,
I obtain a copy of the building’s evacuation map for
each floor (usually hanging on the wall next the elevator)
and use this to locate the look direction of my images and
write notes on them. Much later in the project, these same
base maps are inserted directly into the report thermogram
pages to serve again as photo reference maps. This one step
has eliminated the need for me, in all but a few cases, to
measure out roofs, buildings, and interior rooms and then
transfer these data into a computer drawn site map. If the
image quality in GE is not up to par, you can import the image
into your favorite draw program - mine happens to be PowerPoint
- and trace the outline of it to create a straight-line drawing
of the building/roof.
Another helpful practice is to identify leak sites throughout
a building and/or roof and mark them on your field map(s)
with the help of the building owner / engineer prior to conducting
an inspection. Once located, you can use this as a guide to
perform your inspection in all possible places of access in
and around the leak.
Familiarity with
Your Subject
You should know something about the system
you are inspecting. This may sound obvious, but knowing about
the building’s construction, what type of roof insulation
system is present, if there is a multi-roof system present,
the location of water leaks, and other problems the building
is suffering from is fundamental information that is necessary
to perform an effective inspection. Not only does it help
you to anticipate what types of thermal patterns you may observe,
it also may provide clues as to where water may be entering
and migrating into a building.
|
|
Figure
1. Here, the generalized construction pattern of a building
has been established
to provide an idea of possible thermal patterns to look
for during the inspection |
How does one find out this information? In
some cases, the building manager and/or contractors who work
on the building may have as-built drawings or first-hand knowledge
of the building/roof construction. Also, there are specific
roof designs for installation over different deck systems.
Commercial roofing suppliers and roofing manufacturers can
provide these “spec books”.
Other places to look are in the building
itself. Usually, unfinished parts of a building reveal information
on general construction design. These areas may include storage
rooms, loading docks, electric rooms and other unfinished
areas in the building. One of the best places to look is above
drop ceiling tiles. Here, you will usually find the exterior
and interior wall system, the transition between the walls
and roof, and the roof deck. The last place to check is at
the building wall itself. Tap on the wall to see if it is
Exterior Insulation & Finish System (EIFS), concrete,
or some other material.
I often stop at construction sites to observe
the various phases of construction. If you do this, after
a while you will see a pattern emerge of two or three basic
construction techniques that are unique for your part of the
country.
Cameras
It is difficult to keep track of the new
cameras and features that are being introduced into the market,
unless you are considering purchasing one. Suggesting which
camera to buy is a personal choice dictated by your needs
and budget. What has worked well for me is a camera that has
excellent thermal sensitivity, has the ability to tightly
adjust the temperature span, has a high resolution detector,
and can accept a variety of lenses.
The camera’s thermal sensitivity (the
ability for the detector to actually discern a temperature
difference across a surface) and its ability to generate a
tight temperature span (the smaller the span the greater the
thermal resolution for a given temperature range) will determine
if you see anomalies or not. Keep in mind that some thermal
anomalies you will find may have temperature differences of
1.5 to 2 F degrees. If your camera has a thermal sensitivity
greater than this, you will miss anomalies. Furthermore, if
your camera does not have the ability to generate a small
temperature span, you may lack the resolution necessary to
identify an anomaly, as 1 and 2 F degree changes will get
lost in a particular color scale on your camera.
If your budget allows, spend the extra money
to get a high resolution detector. This will make life in
the field much easier by providing you crisp and detailed
images and provide high quality report images.
Another critical component of an infrared
camera is its ability to accept both wide-angle and telephoto
lenses. Most of the walk-on roof scans we perform are conducted
using a wide-angle 36-degree lens, while multi-story building
inspections are performed using, 24- to 8-degree lenses. Investing
in additional lenses is well worth the cost and in some cases
is the only way to obtain meaningful information.
Moisture Meters
While infrared technology is non-contact
and non-invasive, eventually, verification testing of the
thermal anomalies you present must be conducted. This ultimately
should be performed by a qualified person who is familiar
with the structure under study. However, having the means
to interpret and understand the anomalies you are seeing can
be aided by a moisture meter.
There are two basic types, non-penetrating
and penetrating, which are further broken down into various
models and features. The non-penetrating meters are the easiest
to use, requiring just good contact against the surface you
are testing. The penetrative types require that an opening
be made in the testing surface so that the meter’s prongs
can be inserted into the material you want to test.
|
|
| Figure
2. A non-penetrating moisture meter is shown at left and
a penetrative type at right |
While moisture meters are easy to use, they
have limitations. First, false positive readings are easy
to get if you are unfamiliar with the medium you are testing.
Conductive material that comes into contact with the meter’s
contacts will cause positive readings. This includes metal
deck surfaces, metal lathing used as foundation for stucco
finishes, rebar in concrete, and conductive minerals sometimes
found in lightweight concrete roof insulation. Second, moisture
meters should be used for qualitative results. If quantitative
results are necessary, ASTM testing labs should be used. Finally,
moisture testing can be destructive. If any questions exist
regarding repairs or testing procedures, have someone else
who is qualified perform them. For instance, I do not perform
penetrative testing on EIFS or concrete walls. Whenever we
have to perform moisture testing on a roof, a certified roofing
contractor is present to cut and repair the roof. If lightweight
concrete insulation is present in a roof system, we recommend
that moisture-by-weight percent testing be performed by a
certified testing lab.
Best Times to
Scan
You and your client should not expect
to get complete results with just a single scan. A typical
job involves at least a “cooling” and a “warming”
scan. Obviously, cooling conditions are best at night and
warming conditions during the day; however, it is important
to realize that since building walls face different directions,
they will experience warming and cooling events at different
times of the day. East walls will warm in the morning and
cool during the afternoon, whereas west walls follow the opposite
pattern. South walls may stay warm throughout the entire day
and only cool at night. North walls, although they rarely
have direct solar loading, will capture solar energy from
nearby buildings and also will undergo ambient temperature
changes. Delta temperatures will not be as significant here
as on other parts of the building, but thermal patterns will
be detectable.
| Evening
scan (cooling) vs. afternoon scan (warming) |
|
|
Figure
3. Infrared image on left shows thermal pattern on building’s
stairwell tower wall during an evening scan under cooling
conditions. A thermal anomaly
can be seen along the inside corner of the stairtower
and trash chute.
|
Infrared
image on right shows thermal pattern on building’s
stairwell tower wall during an afternoon scan under
warming conditions. A mottled thermal anomaly can be
seen on the front face of the stairwell tower, possibly
showing areas of delaminating stucco. |
Scanning buildings at and near the ocean
can create difficult conditions with ever prevailing winds.
It is best to start your scanning earlier than normal during
cooling conditions and be prepared to loose your imaging window
much sooner than normal, given the accelerated cooling created
by the wind. If wind becomes too strong, thermal patterns
may be absent or distorted.
Only when I am sure that I have seen every
building wall during at least one cooling and warming event
and the roof under cooling conditions, do I concede that the
scan is complete. As with any inspection, there may be times
when certain walls or parts of walls and roofs cannot be scanned,
either because of trees, continuous shading, irregular exposure
to sun, excessive hot or cold exhaust from fans, etc. When
confronted with these obstacles I usually don’t spend
too much time tying to resolve them; rather, I include in
my report that limitations were encountered.
Dealing with Rain
Rain is a problem if it occurs immediately
before or during an inspection. I have seen thermal patterns
of evaporating water on walls shortly after a rain event that
could be mistaken for anomalies. Rain will also cool surfaces
very quickly and retard thermal transmission. It is important
that the wall and roof surfaces are dry during a scan. This
excludes active leak sites that may have water migration near
the wall surface.
On the other hand, rain occurring one
or two days prior to an inspection can be beneficial. Water
migration in many building and roof leaks have very short
resident times. Granted, most roof and EIFS insulations will
hold water indefinitely, but certain foam insulations and
concrete structures do not. If wallboard is left to dry, it
will not readily show a thermal anomaly. So, having water
enter the system from time to time can be all that is needed
to see significant anomalies versus seeing nothing. The images
below (Figure 4) exemplify how time sensitive some inspections
can be with respect to rain.
| |
|
Figure 4. Infrared image on left shows
penthouse wall void of any thermal anomalies during
dry period and the same wall, on the right, one day
after a rain event showing a radial thermal pattern
of moisture |
Delta-Temperature
Problems
Unique to Florida’s weather is
that during rainy parts of the year (summer months), delta-temperatures
can be as low as 6- to 8-degrees from a daytime high to an
evening low. It stays warm well into the evening hours and
gets hot very early in the morning. I didn’t give much
thought as to how this may affect infrared inspections until
I recently observed thermal patterns on walls that contradicted
what I was expecting to see. What I observed were warm anomalies
on walls that were warming early in the day that tested positive
for moisture (Figure 5). Under normal conditions, this relationship
should be just the opposite. The only explanation I can offer
is that the water laden areas of the wall never reached a
temperature inversion with the dry sections of the wall throughout
the evening hours. Therefore, only during the hottest parts
of the day would the dry and wet sections of wall be at or
close to the same temperature, and at all other times, the
wet sections of wall would show up as warm areas.
| |
|
Figure 5. Infrared image shows thermal
anomaly of trapped moisture in wall during an early
morning scan. Area of anomaly tested positive for moisture
using moisture meter |
Another challenge low delta-temperatures
create is faint thermal patterns on walls. Compounding this
problem is the fact that most buildings have structural variations
that cause non-uniform warming and cooling of walls throughout
the day. For instance, a balcony or a main divider wall between
two condo units may impart shade on certain parts of a wall
for a period of time while others areas may receive direct
sunlight. With low delta-temperature conditions superimposed
onto an already non-uniform thermally loaded wall, it is necessary
to adjust the level and span on your camera to obtain meaningful
data. One of the easiest ways to accomplish this is to bring
a particular section of wall you want to inspect into the
camera’s field and do an auto-adjust of the level and
span. It is important to remove any wall or subject matter
that you do not want to inspect out of the field of view of
the camera. Since most of the thermal anomalies are going
to be very slight, a very small temperature span focused around
the wall is needed. Do not be surprised if you have to perform
this function numerous times as you work your way around a
building.
Don’t Be
Afraid to Look
Another useful practice I use when performing
an inspection is to look beyond the surface I am imaging.
This usually requires performing a visual inspection in areas
above drop ceiling tiles, interior sides of roof leak sites,
exterior sides of interior leaks, and any other area adjacent
to thermal anomalies that may provide clues as to why and
where water is entering a system. It can also help you validate
what you think you are seeing in a thermal pattern.
Don’t worry if you cannot initially
explain a thermal pattern. If you take the time and look in
areas that you normally would not, most of the thermal patterns
can be understood.
The series of images
below demonstrates the importance of investigating your anomalies.
| |
|
Figure 6. The left infrared image shows
a thermal anomaly on the side of brick column. Inspection
above the tile ceiling shows a cold anomaly of tracing
water directly below the brick column |
 |
|
Figure
7. The left infrared image shows a thermal image of
a roof taken from a higher roof showing a warm anomaly
on the side of a metal panel wall. Conducting a thermal
and visual inspection of the interior side of the wall
(middle and right photos), above the drop ceiling, confirmed
that the thermal anomaly did, in fact, represent moisture |
 |
|
Figure
8. The left infrared image shows a thermal image taken
along the same metal panel wall tie-in with the roof
in Figure 7. Small, yet strong thermal anomalies were
detected, yet no moisture was found in the roof during
destructive testing next to the anomalies. Conducting
a thermal and visual inspection of the interior side
of the wall (middle and right photos), above the drop
ceiling, confirmed that the thermal anomaly did, in
fact, represent moisture (dark area at arrow in visual
photo) that was migrating along the edge of the metal
roof deck |
Use Composite
Image Software
Whenever I am scanning large subjects such
as the sides of buildings, large roof areas, or close-in work
in an interior room, I will take a series of thermal images
to be used to create a composite image. I find FLIR’s
Image Building program invaluable for this task, but I have
been told that Adobe Photoshop and other similar programs
work well. The final product shows the “big picture”
rather than a series of smaller isolated images that tend
to make reports disjointed and confusing to the client. The
trick to making your final image look balanced is to photograph
your subject from one side and from one spot. By doing this,
you keep the point of perspective in sync with each successive
image you take. I have had poor results capturing images facing
perpendicular to a subject as I move a few tens of feet between
shots.
Keep in mind that you have to bring
each image you want to snap together to the same temperature
level and span prior to moving them into the composite program.
Once assembled, the image can be imported into report thermogram
pages.
| |
|
Figure 9. Creating a composite image
from a series of single infrared thermograms (shown
here is the side of building) provides a “big
picture” that adds clarity and perspective to
your images. You should notice that each single image
has a common overlap with the adjacent image that makes
it easy to connect the images into one |
A
Look at Thermographic Case Studies
I have organized this section of the paper
to include various types of building systems common to Florida
that I have encountered while performing infrared inspections.
For each system, I have presented examples of thermal images
and a brief explanation of my experience with each one. Generally
classified they are: Exterior Insulation & Finish System
(EIFS), Concrete Masonry Units (concrete block), Wood Frame,
Brick, Roof Systems, and Interior Walls.
Exterior Insulation
& Finish Systems
Exterior Insulation & Finish Systems,
commonly referred to as EIFS, are a non-bearing exterior cladding
used to weatherproof, beautify and insulate commercial buildings
with moisture sensitive sheathing or framing. The cut-away
diagram below shows the basic components of this system, but
keep in mind other similar systems with minor differences
also exist.
| |
|
Figure 10. Cutaway diagram at left showing
main components in an EIFS construction (image courtesy
of Total Wall Inc.). Middle photo shows the exterior
finish, fiberglass mesh and internal foam. Photo at
left shows exterior drywall fastened to metal stud wall
system. |
What qualifies EIFS to be an excellent candidate
for infrared technology is that the foam insulation collects
and holds moisture if the exterior coating is punctured or
if flashing and joint details fail.
Thermal patterns I have observed on
EIFS vary and can be very strong, blotchy, shadowy and/or
faint.
| |
|
Figure 11. Examples of trapped moisture
within EIFS wall panels. Areas of moisture are represented
as orange patterns on wall |
Other types of foam building materials include
copings, cornices, trims and bands that are applied directly
to the exterior of buildings. Some of these architectural
accents are glued in place and others are mechanically fastened.
Depending on their span lengths, they will inevitably have
joints that are sealed with caulk. Water entry points on these
types of products are in three places: through the surface
if it is not sealed correctly or is sealed using cheap materials,
at the caulk joints, and where the mechanical fasteners enter
through the attachment wall.
The images below show an example of
water migration through open caulk joints on a foam sill fastened
atop a concrete block parapet wall.
| |
|
Figure 12. Infrared image shows migrating
and trapped moisture. Middle image is control picture
showing location of one of several areas where caulk
joint is open as shown in right image |
The images below show an example of water
migration through a mechanically fastened foam coping detail.
Water originally entered into the foam material because of
a poor quality finish coating.
| |
|
Figure 13. Infrared image shows trapped
moisture in foam coping detail as dark areas at arrow.
Middle image is control picture showing foam detail
and right image shows water migrating into block wall
at arrow. Images captured within 6 hours of a rain event
during a warming cycle |
Concrete Masonry
Units (CMU) Construction
Concrete masonry units (CMU), commonly referred
to as concrete blocks, are one of the most commonly used building
materials in Florida. Both commercial and residential builders
take advantage of this easy to install and extremely strong
building design. CMUs in their raw form are extremely porous
and absorbent. Therefore, an exterior finish is required to
make this building system waterproof. Three finishing designs
that I have observed are: waterproof exterior coatings, stucco
skim coating, and wood and/or cement based sidings. Of the
three types of finish materials mentioned here, I have observed
thermal anomalies related with the waterproof coating and
stucco systems.
Direct Applied
Coatings
Direct applied coating products are
usually water-based elastomeric materials that allow moisture
to escape from the block and prevent water from entering.
Water intrusion problems can arise from improper application
methods and natural degradation of the material over time.
Another way water can enter this system is from hairline and
surface cracks that break the coating surface, thereby providing
direct pathways for water into the block framework.
| |
|
Figure 14. Moisture infiltration on
concrete block walls with elastomeric coating. Image
on left shows a hairline crack in the wall where water
is entering the wall. Image on right shows a coat system
that is breaking down, allowing moisture to be absorbed
through the block face |
Stucco Coat
Stucco over CMU is popular, in part,
because it is very durable in high humidity environments as
are found in Florida. It can be applied directly over concrete
block or applied over metal lathing that is mechanically attached
to the block. To help control surface cracks, control joint
details are commonly attached to the block that serve as partitioning
boundaries. When metal lath is used, vapor barriers are sometimes
applied as a base material to the block to enhance waterproofing
capabilities.
| |
|
Figure 15. Image on left shows direct
applied stucco over CMU that is de-bonding. Middle image
shows vapor barrier directly applied to CMU prior to
metal lath and stucco finish. Image on right shows mechanically
fastened metal lath and control joint bands applied
over moisture barrier and CMU |
After the active hurricane season of 2004,
concerns were raised about how well stucco resists wind-driven
rain. A joint study was performed by the Florida Concrete
& Products Association (FC&PA) and the National Concrete
Masonry Association (NCMA). The studies showed that stucco
applied at 1/2 inch thick or greater provided excellent resistance
to moisture penetration at winds up to 155 miles per hour
at 24 hour exposure. The study also showed that “at
180 mph, the amount of dampness on the leeward (non-wind)
side of the wall was similar for both stucco material thicknesses
(1/4 and 1/2 in. or 6 and 13 mm). The thicker coating allowed
much less water penetration - measured by water collected
on the bottom of the cells on the flashing - than the skim
coat (1/8 in. or 3 mm) at extended time and pressure”.
So what kind of problems with stucco can
be detected with infrared? It has been my experience that
surface cracks, debonding flaws and control joint failures
all are readily detected by infrared. In addition, any and
all of these problems can allow water to enter and migrate
through a block wall system, providing thermal patterns commonly
associated with trapped moisture.
Wall cracks and delaminated stucco
usually appear as warm thermal anomalies during an initial
warming cycle but slowly disappear as warming continues. The
two images presented in Figure 16 were taken during the early
to mid-morning hours as the sun loaded up the walls.
| |
|
Figure 16. Image on left shows a vertical
crack in stucco warming much quicker than the surrounding
wall during an early morning sun. Faint thermal halos
on the side of the crack are areas of de-bonded stucco.
Image on right shows an area of de-bonded stucco (orange
area) |
Surface cracks provide excellent pathways
for water entry into a wall system. They can also help promote
stucco de-bonding. The infrared images below show examples
of wall cracks that have lead to probable water migration
and stucco de-bonding. Notice the left image in particular
that shows possible moisture, (purple and blue areas) that
has collected in the wall system by entering the horizontal
crack.
| |
|
Figure 17. Image on left was taken during
an early morning sun and shows a horizontal crack in
stucco with possible trapped moisture seated in the
wall (blue/purple area). Right image shows a vertical
and horizontal wall crack up high with possible trapped
moisture and stucco de-bonding (orange areas). Areas
of stucco de-bonding were tapped with a hammer to confirm
their condition |
Another feature that can lead to water intrusion
problems with stucco is control joints. These are usually
plastic bands that separate large wall surfaces into smaller
areas to diminish the possibilities of “runaway”
wall cracks. Figure 15 shows an example of how a control joint
is installed to a wall system using mechanical fasteners.
Either a loose fastener or a poorly installed joint can lead
to a pathway for water entry. The images below show an example
of trapped moisture in a wall system because of an improperly
installed control joint.
| |
|
Figure 18. Image on left shows trapped
moisture in a stucco wall system below a control joint.
The right image shows an opening in the joint at a corner
seam that is allowing water to enter the wall |
Wood/Metal Frame
Wood and metal framing is commonly
used in Florida for both residential and commercial buildings.
They are flexible in their design potential and go up quickly
to meet construction schedules. Vapor barriers are a must
for this type of construction and are stapled directly to
the plywood or other sheathing material before the finished
product is applied. Foam cornices and other trim accent pieces
are also commonly installed on this type of construction.
Two of the most common finishing systems to cover framed construction
are stucco finishes and wood or cement based siding products.
While I have yet to see thermal anomalies associated with
concrete siding products, I have seen problems associated
with stucco and wood siding materials.
| |
|
Figure 19. Image on left shows wood
framed commercial building with vapor barrier applied.
Note the foam trim piece applied in the upper right
corner to make up the eave of the building. Image on
right shows stucco being applied over metal lathing
on a different section of the building |
Stucco Finish
over Frame Construction
As stucco finish requires a base of metal
lathing that is mechanically fastened to the wood siding.
The same types of thermal patterns observed with stucco over
concrete block are observed with stucco over framed construction.
The following images show examples of trapped moisture and/or
other structural deficiencies on stucco systems that have
been applied over framed structures.
| |
|
Figure 20. Infrared image showing examples
of deficiencies (orange areas in images) in stucco finish
coats applied over framed construction |
Wood Siding
on Frame Construction
Following an active hurricane season in Florida
a few years ago, I was asked to provide a condition assessment
survey for a condominium association located on the beach.
The association had hired a contractor to perform remediation
work on several of the multi-story condo units and wanted
to verify that work was being done according to the project
specifications. The units were framed with T-111 wood siding.
The roof system was a combination of shingles on sloped wood
deck and modified bitumen on flat wood deck. The images below
show the results of this project.
| |
|
Figure 21. Infrared image showing trapped
moisture (orange areas) in wood siding and sloped wood
sheathing on a shingle roof system |
 |
|
Figure 22. Infrared image showing trapped
moisture (orange areas in images) beneath a shingle
roof system. Edge metal flashing was not installed correctly
and allowed for moisture to enter the wood deck |
 |
|
Figure 23. Infrared image showing trapped
moisture (orange areas in images) in wood siding of
a condo unit |
Following the submittal of our report,
the deficiencies sited above along with several others were
verified by the contractor and corrected. It was found that
the contractor was not aware of the water damaged wall siding
and had failed to replace rotted and water soaked roof decking
prior to installing new roofing material.
Brick
Brick construction is not as prevalent in
the southern part of Florida as it is in the central and northern
parts. I have, however, performed infrared inspections on
brick construction with exceptionally good results. Thermal
patterns associated with water intrusion on brick are very
predictable - cold anomalies during warming phases and hot
anomalies during cooling.
A few years ago, I was hired by the
Florida Department of Transportation to perform an inspection
on one of their buildings that had mold. What made this project
especially educational was that some of the areas inside the
building were already in remediation phases, so the interior
wallboard was removed, exposing the interior side of the framing
and brick. It was invaluable to see thermal anomalies I had
identified correlate with areas of known moisture. This gave
me and my client confidence to predict where other areas of
moisture could be expected. Images collected during this project
are presented below.
| |
|
Figure 24. Infrared image on left showing
trapped moisture (orange areas in images) in brick.
Image on right shows back side of brick with water retardant
coating and rusted metal studs from seeping water |
 |
|
Figure 25. Infrared images showing trapped
moisture (orange areas in images) in brick |
Roof Systems
Following a series of hurricanes in Florida,
I came across a thermal anomaly that occurred on both a wall
and a roof section adjacent to the wall. At first, I thought
the roof anomaly was caused by thermal reflection from the
wall, but when the moisture meter tested positive in the roof
I had to reevaluate my assumption. The roof area with the
anomaly was void of penetrations and appeared in excellent
condition, other than the fact that it had trapped moisture.
Upon testing the wall for moisture and getting a positive
result, I realized that the roof moisture was originating
from the building wall. When asked, our client confirmed that
roof flashing and a door threshold had blown off during a
storm, exposing the wall to water. Since that time, I have
come across similar cases where I am able to identify cracks
and other flashing details on walls that provide pathways
for water migration into roof systems.
Below are a couple of cases where I
have had excellent correlation between wall and adjacent roof
anomalies that have tested positive for moisture in both the
roof and wall.
| |
|
Figure 26. Infrared images showing trapped
moisture (orange areas in images) in roof system. Areas
on walls tested positive for both moisture and stucco
de-bonding and were directly correlated to extensive
wall cracks |
Interior Walls
With mold awareness peaking over the past
few years, infrared cameras have become the “go to”
tool to provide visual documentation of moisture conditions
inside of buildings. Most of this work involves interior wall
space with drywall being the host for moisture. Two basic
types of water intrusion that affect interior walls and that
are detectable with an infrared camera are tracing water and
deep seated moisture conditions. The thermal patterns associated
with these are different from each other as explained below.
Tracing Water
Tracing water conditions are best seen
during rain events or shortly thereafter. In most cases, the
thermal anomaly you see will be cold as a direct result of
the actual water temperature being cooler that its surroundings
or because the water is evaporating as it is exposed to the
interior air.
| |
|
Figure 27. Tracing water trails (black/blue/purple
colors) on an atrium wall during a rain storm. An inspection
on the outside of the atrium showed that the windows
(shown in black at top of image) were leaking |
Tracing water patterns are generally long,
thin, amorphous patterns that mimic the water migration path
it is revealing. In some cases, you can trace the water marks
back to their source (where water is entering the building).
In figure 27, the image shows water tracing down an interior
wall on an atrium with a series of windows above. It can be
seen from the image that the water is originating from the
window.
Deep Seated
Wall Moisture
Most of us relate water intrusion inside
a building as a specific leak site, say for example around
a window frame or door jamb. Moisture in the form of water
vapor can also produce water damage on interior walls and
this damage can be readily detected with infrared. When faced
with such situations I find the use of a moisture meter invaluable.
It will help verify anomalies and help you become more efficient
during the survey. The following case studies show how moisture
can migrate into buildings in the form of vapor and cause
mold and moisture damage on interior walls.
The first case was a bank building
that was constructed of concrete block with a stucco finish
and drywall attached to studs on the interior side. During
the inspection, I noticed a large thermal pattern on an exterior
wall. My moisture meter showed that the first 1.5 inch depth
of the wall was dry (the penetration depth of the meter is
1.5 inches). An inspection of the roof and drop ceiling in
this area showed no irregular thermal patterns. Upon inspecting
the interior side of this wall I noticed a warm thermal pattern
that cooled from the top to the bottom of the wall. A moisture
meter confirmed that the warm section of wall had a high moisture
content.
| |
|
Figure 28. Infrared image on left shows
an exterior wall with a thermal anomaly that tested
dry for moisture at a depth of 1.5 inches into the wall
surface. White box on image shows approximate location
of interior wall as shown at right. The image on right
shows the interior side of the wall that tested positive
for moisture in the upper section of the wall |
Upon submitting the results to the client,
he told me that several years ago the exterior wall had numerous
hairline cracks that allowed enough moisture into the building
so that the interior drywall had to be replaced because of
mold damage. The cracks on the wall were repaired and repainted
and the problem was thought to have been corrected. It was
apparent from our scan that although the exterior side of
the wall was void of moisture, moisture was still present
within the wall system and mold growth behind the wall was
very likely.
Another job took me to a local hospital that
was experiencing condensation dripping from the ceiling inside
a newly constructed operating room. For sanitation reasons
the room was always kept under negative pressure. When the
condensation problem arose, it was believed that a steam leak
from piping above the ceiling was to blame. The use of ultrasound
ruled out a steam leak.
My next step was to check the exterior
side of the ceiling area where it met the roof. A thermal
anomaly was discovered in a section of the roof flashing along
the operating room wall. I also found warm air being drawn
into the room along the roof deck inside the drop ceiling.
The client followed-up our work with another contractor who
used smoke to trace the airflow into the operating room. His
results were very close to our initial findings; warm humid
air was entering the room via the flashing detail along the
roof system.
| |
|
Figure 29. Infrared image on left shows
an exterior wall with a thermal anomaly (orange area)
that tested positive for moisture. This wall flashing
ties into the upper ceiling area of the operating room.
Right image shows the interior side of the roof deck
showing warm humid air being drawn into the open ceiling
space |
While on the same job, we were asked to see
if the interior walls of the operating room had suffered moisture
damage because of the looming humid conditions. The results
of this inspection showed that one of the main walls had a
faint thermal pattern that tested positive for moisture. The
anomaly started on the side of the wall closest to the wall
that connected to the outside and gradually faded into a normal
thermal pattern that tested dry with a moisture meter. It
was evident that the warm humid air had migrated behind the
walls and was now migrating into the drywall.
| |
|
Figure 30. Infrared image showing faint
thermal pattern of moisture in wall. The wall temperature
difference from high to low moisture areas was less
than 1.5 F degrees |
Conclusion
Florida’s unique climate presents challenges
to thermographers in the building science sector. When consumer
demands for thermal imaging services are at their highest,
so are hot, humid and rainy weather patterns that bring with
them low delta-temperature changes and wet scanning conditions.
Learning to use these obstacles to your advantage as well
as familiarity with your camera’s capabilities can provide
successful scanning year round in Florida. Also, having a
good set of base maps to work from will make your time in
the field and office more productive.
Understanding not only climatic patterns
but also local building designs for your area will greatly
increase scanning results. Each system has unique thermal
patterns associated with it. Knowing where construction weaknesses
that allow water intrusion and other deficiencies to develop
in building systems are will increase your awareness of what
to look for and where to look.
Finally, not every anomaly documented
will be understood. Using a moisture meter can help verify
some anomalies and provide confidence in your work. Other
anomalies may only be rectified through destructive testing,
often times carried out by other contractors. If possible,
following up with your client to learn of project outcomes
will further your understanding of the thermal anomalies you
uncover.
|